The BI Survey 7 - Table of contents
To return to the Product Overview, click here
1 | Introduction |
|
1.1 | Executive summary | 1 |
1.2 | Vendor independence | 3 |
1.3 | Key findings | 3 |
1.3.1 | The market | 3 |
1.3.2 | The selection process | 4 |
1.3.3 | Achievement of business goals | 6 |
1.3.4 | Realizing business benefits | 7 |
1.3.5 | The power of the brand | 8 |
1.3.6 | Applications | 9 |
1.3.7 | Products | 9 |
1.3.8 | Purchases | 11 |
1.3.9 | Cost of ownership | 12 |
1.3.10 | Customer loyalty | 12 |
1.3.11 | Platforms | 13 |
1.3.12 | Data sources | 14 |
1.3.13 | Data volumes | 14 |
1.3.14 | Implementation and rollout | 15 |
1.3.15 | Deployment issues and problems | 16 |
1.3.16 | Performance issues | 17 |
1.3.17 | BI and the Web | 18 |
1.4 | Charting conventions | 20 |
1.5 | Means, medians, quartiles and modes | 21 |
|
|
|
2 | The sample |
|
2.1 | Objectives | 24 |
2.1.1 | Large sample | 24 |
2.1.2 | Well-distributed | 25 |
2.1.3 | Unbiased | 25 |
2.2 | Sample size and make-up | 26 |
2.3 | BI buyers compared with non-buyers | 27 |
2.4 | Respondents‚ perspectives | 27 |
2.5 | Geographic distribution | 30 |
2.6 | Organization sizes by revenue | 34 |
2.7 | Organization sizes by employees | 35 |
2.8 | Vertical markets | 35 |
|
|
|
3 | Products included |
|
3.1 | Product list | 39 |
3.2 | Augmented samples | 41 |
3.3 | Vendor notes | 42 |
3.3.1 | Applix | 42 |
3.3.2 | arcplan | 43 |
3.3.3 | Board | 43 |
3.3.4 | Business Objects | 43 |
3.3.5 | Cognos | 44 |
3.3.6 | Cubeware | 44 |
3.3.7 | Hyperion | 44 |
3.3.8 | Infor | 45 |
3.3.9 | Information Builders | 46 |
3.3.10 | Microsoft | 46 |
3.3.11 | MicroStrategy | 47 |
3.3.12 | MIK | 47 |
3.3.13 | Oracle | 47 |
3.3.14 | Pentaho | 48 |
3.3.15 | SAP | 48 |
3.4 | The architectural mix | 51 |
|
|
|
4 | Age profiles |
|
4.1 | Product age profiles | 54 |
4.2 | Changing product shares | 56 |
|
|
|
5 | The purchase cycle |
|
5.1 | What influences the evaluation list? | 58 |
5.1.1 | Influences by product evaluated | 59 |
5.1.1 | Influences by license fees, platforms and data volumes | 61 |
5.1.2 | Influences by organization demographics | 62 |
5.2 | Which industry analysts are influential, and where? | 63 |
5.3 | Does it pay to use industry analyst advice? | 67 |
5.4 | The benefits of conducting a formal evaluation | 67 |
5.5 | Why organizations choose products | 71 |
5.6 | ... and how they should have chosen | 79 |
5.7 | License fees | 80 |
5.7.1 | License fees by product, vendor and architecture | 83 |
5.7.2 | License fees by evaluation method | 84 |
5.7.3 | License fees by implementation | 86 |
5.7.4 | License fees by organization demography | 87 |
5.8 | Do you get what you pay for? | 89 |
|
|
|
6 | The BI ownership experience |
|
6.1 | Proportion of employees regularly using BI | 91 |
6.2 | Departments using BI | 99 |
6.3 | Resources used to run and administer BI projects | 100 |
6.4 | Business goals achieved | 101 |
6.4.1 | Business goals achieved, analyzed by product and vendor | 102 |
6.4.1 | Business goals achieved, analyzed by lead implementer | 105 |
6.4.2 | Business goals achieved, analyzed by time since purchase | 105 |
6.5 | Business benefits enjoyed | 108 |
6.6 | The Business Benefits Index | 110 |
6.6.1 | Benefits trends | 111 |
6.6.1 | Benefits analyzed by product and vendor | 112 |
6.6.2 | Benefits analyzed by architecture, selection method, age and distribution | 116 |
6.6.3 | Benefits analyzed by Web deployment rate and license fees | 118 |
6.6.4 | Benefits analyzed by Web implementation factors | 119 |
6.6.5 | Benefits analyzed by customer demography | 121 |
6.7 | The Cost of Ownership Index | 122 |
|
|
|
7 | Vendor effectiveness |
|
7.1 | Vendor marketing effectiveness | 123 |
7.1.1 | Getting on the short list | 123 |
7.1.2 | Short listing trend | 126 |
7.1.3 | Avoiding competitive evaluations | 128 |
7.2 | Vendor self perception | 129 |
7.3 | Sales success: winners and losers | 131 |
7.3.1 | Win rates by evaluation type | 133 |
7.3.1 | Win rate trends | 134 |
7.3.2 | Win rates by organization size | 137 |
7.3.3 | Win rates by organization location | 139 |
7.4 | Buyer demographics | 140 |
7.5 | Licenses purchased | 143 |
7.6 | Deployed seats | 144 |
7.7 | Prevalence rates | 146 |
7.8 | Shelfware | 149 |
7.9 | Likelihood of using all purchased seats within a year | 152 |
7.10 | Future buying intentions | 153 |
7.11 | Product support | 155 |
7.11.1 | Product support methods | 155 |
7.11.2 | Overall product support ratings | 159 |
7.11.3 | Comparing vendor product support performance | 160 |
7.11.4 | Who provides better product support — large or small vendors? | 164 |
7.11.5 | Comparing support scores by respondent type | 165 |
7.11.1 | Do big customers get better product support? | 166 |
7.12 | Customer loyalty | 167 |
7.12.1 | Product abandonment | 168 |
7.12.2 | Which would they standardize on? | 170 |
7.12.3 | Reasons for standardization | 172 |
7.12.4 | The loyalty league table | 174 |
7.12.5 | Loyalty trends | 176 |
|
|
|
8 | Implementation |
|
8.1 | Implementers | 178 |
8.2 | External consulting spend | 183 |
8.2.1 | External fees by respondent type and most influential analyst firm | 184 |
8.2.1 | External fees by products, architecture and data volumes | 185 |
8.2.2 | External fees by license fees, implementation times and lead implementer | 186 |
8.2.3 | External fees by organization demography | 188 |
8.3 | Do you get what you pay for? | 189 |
8.4 | Which implementer is the most successful? | 191 |
|
|
|
9 | Timescales |
|
9.1 | By product and vendor | 197 |
9.2 | By architecture, platform, implementer and data volume | 198 |
9.3 | By organization demography | 199 |
9.4 | Installed within three or six months | 200 |
9.5 | Implementation times conclusions | 201 |
|
|
|
10 | What goes wrong? |
|
10.1 | Problems encountered | 203 |
10.2 | People problems | 209 |
10.3 | Data problems | 213 |
10.4 | Product-related technical problems | 214 |
10.5 | Normalized product-related problem analysis | 220 |
10.6 | The problem mix in perspective | 223 |
10.7 | Deterrents to wider deployment | 227 |
10.7.1 | Barriers analyzed by product | 229 |
10.7.1 | Barriers analyzed by architecture, fees and platform | 231 |
10.7.2 | Barriers analyzed by lead implementer and implementation time | 233 |
10.7.3 | No deterrents to wider deployment rankings | 234 |
|
|
|
11 | Applications |
|
11.1 | Applications by role and industry analyst | 237 |
11.2 | Applications by product and vendor | 238 |
11.3 | Applications by architecture, deal characteristics | 240 |
11.4 | Applications by platform, volumes and implementer | 241 |
11.5 | Applications by organization demographics | 243 |
|
|
|
12 | Web BI |
|
12.1 | Web deployment trends | 245 |
12.2 | Web deployment rates by respondent and organization | 248 |
12.3 | Web deployment rates by product and vendor | 249 |
12.4 | Web deployment rates by selection and implementation | 251 |
12.5 | Web deployment rates by application | 253 |
12.6 | Web deployment trends by product since 2002 | 254 |
12.7 | Effects of Web deployment on business success | 255 |
12.8 | Extranet usage | 257 |
12.8.1 | Extranet deployment rates | 257 |
12.8.1 | Extranet deployment trends | 258 |
12.8.2 | Extranet deployment by product, vendor and architecture | 260 |
12.8.3 | Extranet deployment by platform, implementation and demographics | 262 |
12.8.4 | Extranet target users | 263 |
12.9 | Browsers used for BI deployments | 267 |
12.10 | Preferred BI Web architectures | 271 |
|
|
|
13 | Server platforms |
|
13.1 | Server platform trend | 276 |
13.2 | Server platforms by product, vendor and architecture | 279 |
13.3 | Server platforms by input data volumes | 282 |
13.4 | Server platforms by source, license fees and mode | 282 |
13.5 | Server platforms by organization factors | 283 |
13.6 | Does the server platform affect business success? | 284 |
13.7 | The rise of 64-bit BI | 285 |
|
|
|
14 | Client/server combos |
|
14.1 | Client tools used with 'open' OLAP servers | 289 |
14.1.1 | Analysis Services client tools | 290 |
14.1.1 | Essbase client tools | 292 |
14.1.2 | SAP BI/BW client tools | 294 |
14.1.3 | TM1 client tools | 295 |
14.1.4 | Comparing the server tools markets | 296 |
14.2 | BI data sources | 296 |
14.2.1 | Data sources accessed by arcplan | 297 |
14.2.2 | Data sources accessed by Business Objects client tools | 298 |
14.2.3 | Data sources accessed by Cognos client tools | 299 |
14.2.4 | Data sources accessed by Cubeware Cockpit | 300 |
14.2.5 | Data sources accessed by Information Builders WebFOCUS | 300 |
14.2.6 | Data sources accessed by Microsoft BI client tools | 301 |
14.2.1 | Comparing the number of data sources accessed by BI client tools | 302 |
|
|
|
15 | Source databases |
|
15.1 | Source databases | 304 |
15.1.1 | Source database trends | 305 |
15.2 | Data source mix by input data volumes | 306 |
15.3 | Data source mix by product and vendor | 307 |
15.4 | Data source mix by product type and platform | 308 |
15.5 | Data source mix by organization demography | 309 |
15.6 | Most popular BI tools used with major databases | 310 |
15.6.1 | The Microsoft database BI league tables | 311 |
15.6.2 | The Oracle database BI league tables | 312 |
15.6.3 | The IBM database BI league tables | 313 |
15.6.4 | The Sybase database BI league tables | 314 |
15.6.5 | The Teradata database BI league tables | 315 |
15.6.6 | The BI league table in sites performing manual data entry | 316 |
|
|
|
16 | Data volumes |
|
16.1 | Overall data volumes | 318 |
16.2 | Data volumes by product | 320 |
16.3 | Data volumes by platform | 324 |
16.4 | Data volumes by 32-bit vs 64-bit | 324 |
16.5 | Data volumes by architecture | 325 |
16.6 | Data volumes by lead implementer | 326 |
16.7 | Data volumes by industry sector | 326 |
16.8 | Data volumes by customer demographic | 327 |
16.9 | License fees by data volumes | 328 |
16.10 | Is bigger better? | 329 |
|
|
|
17 | Performance at the speed of thought? |
|
17.1 | Does query performance impact business benefits? | 332 |
17.2 | How do you measure performance? | 335 |
17.3 | Reported query times | 337 |
17.4 | Query times vs input data volume | 343 |
17.5 | Complaints about poor query performance | 345 |
17.6 | Query performance complaints trend | 346 |
17.7 | Poor performance deterring wider deployment | 348 |
17.8 | Is MOLAP always faster than ROLAP? | 354 |
17.9 | Is BI faster on UNIX or Windows? | 356 |
17.10 | Data latency: load, build and pre-calculate times | 357 |
17.11 | Does latency impact business benefits? | 358 |
17.12 | Data latency by product and vendor | 359 |
17.13 | Data latency vs input data volume | 362 |
17.14 | Data latency vs architecture | 364 |
17.15 | Performance questions answered | 366 |
|
|
|
18 | Appendix: Survey questionnaire |
|
